The Power of Games
Orthodox Science Fiction

Astrology as Fiction

astrology wheel Every rationally minded individual today considers astrology false. But this conclusion depends upon an unstated premise: that the correct way to evaluate astrology is by a scientific audit of its premises. What if astrology is understood not as a system of knowledge, but as a game of make-believe? What if astrology is evaluated not as fact, but as fiction?

Professor Kendall Walton’s make-believe theory of representation suggests we can understand artworks – paintings, statues, books, movies and games – as props which prescribe certain imaginings. This description is perfectly suited to explaining how astrology functions. When one plays with astrology, there are various principles of generation in force by which maps of the position of stars serve as props which prescribe one imagines certain things, for example that people born at such-and-such a time of year possess certain personality traits, and that they will experience certain generalised events during certain periods of time.

This is not to claim that astrology is false. The truth of an artwork and the truth of a logical proposition or scientific investigation are not equivalent terms. The works of Shakespeare faithfully capture many aspects of the human condition even though they are fiction, and mythic works such as the Ramayana in Hindu tradition have cultural and religious value that is not hindered by its status as fiction. Heidegger asked “What is truth that it can happen as art?” In this vein, I would ask “if astrology is art, can it not contain truth?”

The idea that astrology can be dismissed entirely because it is “obviously false” (which is to say, it is incompatible with orthodox science) fails to ask the more important question: can astrology have value? The question of its cultural or personal value does not rest on its compatibility with scientific method or theory, and the assumption that it does borders on the doctrinaire. Within the game of astrology, one might find a motivation to act when one would otherwise be afraid (“now is a good time for change”), or a means to accept the human nature of others (“Aries is a fire sign”), and these benefits have nothing whatsoever to do with a scientific evaluation of astrology.

No doubt historically the role of astrology far exceeded that of a game of make-believe: forms of divination were used to guide important decisions of state in ancient China and Europe. But for the most part there were no better methods for settling the decisions in question, and as a spur to action it may still have been an adequate tool. If the astrologer was an intelligent, learned, intuitive individual they could raise matters to the attention of the heads of state through divination that otherwise might never be taken into consideration. This of course could also allow a Machiavellian individual to gain power and influence. But substitute “advisor” for “astrologer” and “analysis” for “divination” in the above claims and this is still a valid concern today.

If astrology is understood as fiction, as a game of make-believe in which participants can acquire entertainment and diversion as well as psychological benefits such as increased confidence or mitigated hostilities, it ceases to matter that its methodology cannot be squared with modern scientific paradigms. Perhaps we are too jealous in the guarding of the wall we erect between fiction and fact: man does not live by fact alone. Even the most intensely orthodox scientist still believes in some fictions, such as their sense of self, the reality of the nation they live in, and the validity of the abstraction ‘science’. Fiction is sometimes as useful as fact, and often more enjoyable, and perhaps this is why astrology maintains its popularity even today.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Why do you only show the positive sites like "entertainment and diversion as well as psychological benefits such as increased confidence" but let out the very opposites which happen equally often?

Another great article, by far one of the most clever analysis I've read about astrology. As for most artwork or symbolistic systems, its accurancy depends wildly on its scope.

Would you mind if I translate some of your articles on my (french) blog? I would like to share some of your thoughts but most of my audience is french-speaking. Of course I would mention you as the author and include a link to your website. Please let me know.

Jeena: astrology is a whipping boy that is perpetually savaged by people approaching it from a rationalistic or scientistic perspective; I didn't feel the need to present this side of the issue because personally I find it to be quite widely (and excessively) condemned. I myself have found it very difficult to accept astrology, because of my background in science. What I felt was missing was a reading of astrology that escaped the usual blanket condemnation, hence what I present here.

If you want to present a counterpoint, I would welcome the opportunity to explore both sides of the argument! It is my suspicion, however, that any argument against astrology will rest upon hidden assumptions, although these too would be interesting to explore.

Jean: I would love for you to republish any material that takes your fancy in French! That would be "magnifique"! :) If possible, can you use the trackback system to link your translations to the original posts? Otherwise, leave a note in the comments leading to the French versions.

Thank for your interest and support!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)